Validate if AI was used. Let the student show what they know
Every student defends their own paper in a short AI interview. You see exactly what each one understands, with feedback ready to approve.
You argue that social media replaces face-to-face time rather than adding to it. Which source in your paper supports that, and what did that study actually measure?
Twenge’s study. It tracked teens’ daily screen time against how often they saw friends in person, and as one went up, the other went down.
Good. A critic would say lonely teens simply use social media more, so the arrow points the other way. How does your essay answer that?
You’re the one faculty turn to about AI and student work. Fluent gives you a ready solution for them: an oral defense for every assignment, running this semester.
In less than an hour, set up an AI interview based on your curriculum and evaluation criteria. Students upload their paper and the interviewer asks them about it. You keep full control over the feedback and the grade.
Free trial: 50 interviews, LMS included.
A guided chat turns your assignment and rubric into an interview in under an hour. Share it by link or through your LMS.
Each student uploads their paper and answers questions about it, by voice or text, in a locked, secure browser.
Review AI-drafted feedback for each student, edit or approve it, and export the class results to a spreadsheet or your LMS.
Students talk it through out loud or type their answers. The interviewer has read their paper, follows up on what they say, and covers every point in your rubric.
Your paper: Chen_SOC101_Essay.pdf
Dr. Ellen HartListeningWhich source in your paper shows that social media replaces face-to-face time, and what did that study actually measure?
Worth reteaching: answering the counterargument (class average 71).
Sample data for illustration. Product screens shown as mock-ups.
A resident walks through the reasoning behind their case report: why this diagnosis, what they ruled out.
An M&A paper defended live: where is the ZOPA, what is each side’s BATNA, what moves the deal.
A student teacher explains the choices in their lesson plan and how they’d adapt it for the class in front of them.
A legal memo questioned like a moot court: the strongest counterargument, and how the precedent applies.
An essay on Plato’s Republic, pressed in the Socratic way: what would Thrasymachus say to that?
A design statement for a playground beside a factory, defended on safety, light and community use.
Fluent focuses on knowledge. Every student gets the same chance to show they understand their own work, however it was written, and you see the evidence in their own words.
The interview runs in a locked, secure browser, and every question is about the student’s own paper, so answers come from what they actually understand.
You do. Fluent drafts feedback against your rubric; nothing reaches a student until you edit or approve it.
The full product, LMS connection included, for up to 50 interviews. When you reach the limit, we’ll talk about what comes next.
Student papers and interview answers are used only to give feedback to the student and the lecturer, and never to train AI models. Your institution decides who sees them and how long they are kept, and can ask us to delete them at any time. Student data is encrypted in transit and at rest, and stored in Israel, with a disaster-recovery copy in the European Union. Fluent runs on Cesura, which is certified to ISO 27001 and built to meet GDPR. Our Trust Center has the details. Visit the Trust Center
Every language. Students can defend their paper in the language of your course, by voice or text.
Fifteen minutes: a live interview, the feedback lecturers approve, and how your faculty can start this semester.